In
this period full of war images in all the media, we realized that we are under
attack too.
All over the world people see us as who save the lives of others, but now we
need protection themselves.
The impact of attacks on health care1 in Fragile, Conflict-affected and
Vulnerable (FCV) settings goes well beyond
endangering health providers. Reduced capacity, interrupted services and loss of
health care resources deprive vulnerable populations of urgently needed care,
undermine health systems and jeopardize long-term public health goals.
As the world struggles with the COVID-19 pandemic, protecting health care
where health systems are the most vulnerable has become more important than ever.
Ensuring the right to access health care for everyone, everywhere is not only at
the core of WHO's commitment to achieve better health but also a stepping stone
to a reaching the Sustainable Development Goals or SDGs. At least 415 attacks
against health workers and facilities have been carried out since last year's
coup in Myanmar, according to a report published recently. It has become one of
the most dangerous places on Earth for medics, with half of all such global
attacks in the first six months of last year.
The war in Ethiopia's Tigray region has seen the large-scale destruction of
facilities. With the crisis deepening in Sudan, last month the UN reported 15
healthcare attacks since November.It is over a century and a half since the
agreement of the first Geneva convention, an international prohibition on
attacking the sick and wounded, assaulting or punishing those who offer them
healthcare, and inflicting violence on hospitals and ambulances. Those
protections have since been broadened and strengthened repeatedly.
Campaigning by civil society and the medical community has had a measurable
impact at times. Some governments have
made improvements. In 2018, the World Health Organization introduced a system
for monitoring and reporting attacks, though it has not proved as effective as
anticipated. The International Committee of the Red Cross has brought together
military representatives, armed groups, experts and healthcare workers to
discuss pragmatic measures such as running checkpoints in a way that does not
unduly interfere with medical care.
Here, the analysis of publicly available data collected via WHO's
Surveillance System for Attacks on Health Care (SSA)
from 2018 to 2020
presents a global overview of attacks on health care, the resources that they
affected and their immediate impact on health workers and patients.
The results demonstrate that attacks on health care are highly context-dependent.
The occurrence, nature and dynamics of attacks are closely related to changes in
the operational context of the local health response. Such changes may include
the emergence of new crises, intensification of conflicts, ceasefires or the
deterioration of community acceptance.
In addition, changes in the operational contexts of individual FCV countries
or territories where attacks are more prevalent play an important role in
driving global-level patterns of attacks on health care. For this reason, it
should be noted that the results of this analysis are not representative of
country-level trends and only provide a global overview of all verified
incidents reported through the SSA. However, this analysis can be replicated at
country-level using the SSA dashboard's data export function.
We know what needs to be done. In 2016, the then UN secretary general, Ban
Kimoon, sent a detailed and lengthy set of recommendations for tackling the
issue to the security council. Members took the opportunity to trade
recriminations, but no action resulted. Even countries that pledged support
failed to follow through, for example, by ensuring that domestic laws
incorporate the Geneva conventions.
The ongoing attacks it faces show how desperately sustained effort is needed.
Protecting healthcare is necessary essential for everyone.
Giuseppe Strano Editor-in-Chief Vejovis Journal
|